Researchers from North Carolina State University and Duke University have created the first entropy-stabilized alloy that incorporates oxides – and demonstrated conclusively that the crystalline structure of the material can be determined by disorder at the atomic scale rather than chemical bonding.
“High entropy materials research has been a hot field since 2007, but no one reported that the unique structure of these materials was indeed stabilized by configurational disorder alone – and no one had created an entropy-stabilized material using anything other than metals,” says Jon-Paul Maria, a professor of material science and engineering at NC State and corresponding author of a paper on the new findings.
“While the influence of entropy is present in the natural world – for example, the arrangement of metal ions in feldspar, one of the most common minerals in the Earth’s crust – crystalline solids that are stabilized by entropy alone do not exist naturally,” Maria says. “We wanted to know if it was possible to stabilize an oxide using entropy and whether we could prove it. The answer was yes to both. Oxides were chosen for this study because they enabled us to directly test this entropy question.”
High entropy alloys are materials that consist of four or more elements in approximately equal amounts. More importantly, these elements are distributed randomly at the atomic scale. They have garnered significant attention in recent years because they can have remarkable properties. But to understand entropy-stabilized alloys, you have to understand the crystalline structure of materials.
A material’s crystalline structure consists of a repeating arrangement of atoms, which can be different from material to material. That arrangement is called the crystal’s “lattice type.” For example, think of one crystal as having its atoms arranged as a series of cubes. In a conventional material that contains multiple atom types, the arrangement is regular and ordered. Along one of those cube edges, the atoms would follow a regular repeat pattern. In an entropy-stabilized material, the relative arrangement is completely random.
By adding more and more different atom types to a crystal, you can generate more and more disorder if the arrangement of atoms on that lattice remains random. Finding the right mix of atoms that will retain this randomly mixed state is the key to entropy stabilization and testing the entropy question.
In this case, researchers created an entropy-stabilized material made up of five different oxides in roughly equal amounts: magnesium oxide, cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, copper oxide and zinc oxide. The individual materials were mixed in powder form, pressed into a small pellet, then heat treated at 1000 degrees Celsius for several days to promote reaction and mixing.
The researchers then used the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy to determine that the constituent atoms in the entropy-stabilized oxide were evenly distributed and that their placement in the crystalline lattice structure was random.
“The spectroscopy told us that each unit cell in the entropy-stabilized oxide’s structure had the appropriate distribution of atoms, but that where each atom was located in a unit cell was random,” Maria says. “Making this determination is very difficult, and requires the most sophisticated characterization tools available at the Advanced Photon Source.”
“This is fascinating – we’ve proved that you can create entirely new crystalline phases of matter – but it’s fundamental research,” Maria says. “A lot of additional work needs to be done to characterize the properties of these materials and what the potential applications may be.
“However, the work does tell us that we’ll be able to engineer new materials in unusual ways – and that is very promising for developing materials with desirable properties.”
The paper, “Entropy-Stabilized Oxides,” will be published online Sept. 29 in Nature Communications. Lead author of the paper is NC State Ph.D. student Christina Rost. The paper was co-authored by Edward Sachet, Trent Borman, Ali Moballegh, Elizabeth Dickey, Dong Hou and Jacob Jones of NC State; and by Stefano Curtarolo of Duke.
The research was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office under grant number W911NF-14-0285 and the National Science Foundation under grant number EEC 1156762.